Watch Logan (2017) Full Movie Online Streaming & Download

第一條 三一信仰 林烽銓牧師
2016-11-11
第三條 基督復活 莊璧如牧師
2016-11-15
在本會中〈信仰要道〉第二條道成肉身的內容如下:

聖子即聖父之道,亦即永生上帝,與聖父同體,由童貞女所生,得有人性。以此,有二種純全性情,即神性、人性是也。此二性聯為一體,永不分離,即獨一之基督。誠哉上帝,亦誠哉人也。聖子確實受難,被釘於十字架,既死復葬,使人得與上帝復和,並獻身為祭,不僅贖人原罪,並且贖人本罪。

「道成肉身」這名詞,是指永生神的兒子所作的一種行動,祂取了另外一個本性,就是人性,由童女而生,但仍永遠擁有一個無瑕無疵的神性,這神性是祂在亙古以前已經有的;但祂同時又擁有一個無罪的人性,是永遠的(約一14、腓二2至8、提前三6)。

童女生子:所謂童女生子就是指道成肉身這件事。成了肉身的神子永不會被罪所沾染,因此童女生子的教義極其重要。以賽亞書七章14節預言到童女生子這件事,而馬太福音一章23節,對這件事情加以解釋,指出基督的降生,就是事情的應驗。馬太福音一章23節,稱馬利亞為「童女」(希臘文psrthenos,意思很清楚是指處女)。馬太和路加的記載,都很清楚提及童女生子的教訓。馬太福音一章18節強調,馬利亞是在與約瑟一起生活之前懷孕的;這節經文更說明,她的懷孕是聖靈的工作。馬太福音一章22至23節更強調,基督的降生,是應驗了以賽亞書七章14節童女生子的預言,25節又指出,直至基督的出生,馬利亞還是處女。路加福音一章34節提到,馬利亞從來沒有與男性發生關係,而天使在路加福音一章35節,再向馬利亞解釋說,她的懷孕是聖靈的工作。

基督人性的教義,和基督神性的教義是一樣重要的,如果耶穌不是人,祂就不能代表墮落的人類。約翰一書寫作的主旨,就是要革除那些否定基督真實人性的錯誤教義(比較約壹四2),如果耶穌不是真正的人,祂在十字架上的死,就只是一種幻覺;耶穌必須是個真正的人,才能代替人類而死。聖經強調,耶穌是個真正的人,可是聖經也強調,祂並沒有承受人的罪惡,及墮落本性(約壹三5)。耶穌是由童女所生,童女生子是一個極重要(也是符合聖經)的教義。童女生子是基督無罪的必須條件,如果耶穌是從約瑟而生的,祂就擁有罪的本性。福音書中不少地方都強調,基督是由童女所生的,馬太福音一章2至5節所用的動詞,是主動式(active form)。到第16節提到基督的出生,動詞是故意地改為被動式(passive form)。「耶穌是從……生的」中的動詞,是被動式的,這恰好成為以上記載男人生子的一大對比。

基督神性的含義,初期教會有一些團體,否認基督具有真正的人性,但今天情況卻恰好相反。在過去的兩百多年,自由派神學不遺餘力地否認基督的神性。魯益師(C S.Lewis)說得好,關於基督的位格問題,只能有以下一個結論:除非祂是撒謊者、瘋子,否則祂就是主。細看基督所留下的偉大宣稱,我們不能單單以祂為一位好教師;祂的宣稱遠遠多於一位教師。說基督是神,意思不單是說祂「像神」,基督在祂的位格和工作上,完全與父平等。基督有不折不扣的形像。關於腓立比書二章6節,「祂本有神的形像」一句話,華菲德(B.B.Warfield)曾說:「最清楚不過,祂被宣稱完全與神一樣,並且擁有一切神之為神的完美特性。」

image for movie Logan 2017


Quality: HD
Title : Logan
Director : James Mangold.
Release : 2017-02-28
Language : English,Español
Runtime : 135 min.
Genre : Action, Drama, Science Fiction.
Synopsis :

What happens when our superheroes get old? It’s essentially something that never happens in our movies, where our heroes are always virile and robust, and if they get a little long in the tooth, we just reboot the series and start over with a younger model. But that’s not the case with Logan, which follows maybe the most famous of the X-Men, Wolverine, as he not only deals with his own broken-down body, but with nursing the longtime leader of the X-Men, professor Charles Xavier. Xavier is now in his 90s and struggles to take care of himself, occasionally slipping into dementia and having trouble recognizing Logan or understanding just what’s going on at any particular time.

And this is just part of what separates Logan from any other superhero movie we’ve seen. I’ll admit that I’ve grown a bit tired of superhero origin stories and crash-and-bang ensemble pictures, but Logan is neither of those things. The characters here feel lived-in and real, and the violence is shocking and gritty. When innocent people are killed in this movie, it doesn’t feel like collateral damage; it’s genuinely disturbing and actually makes us realize that real people’s lives are at stake in this universe.

And even all of this barely scratches the surface. Logan gets involved in trying to save a little girl who’s far more like himself than he’d like to admit, and we eventually follow them as they work with a group of young mutant refugees trying to cross the border into Canada to escape persecution. If that doesn’t resonate with our times, I don’t know what will. The X-Men stories have always reflected racial and ethnic tension and fear, and that’s brought to the forefront here in ways I won’t spoil.

But ultimately, it’s the grounding in reality that makes Logan a special film. We see the broken bodies of our superheroes laid bare, we feel the difficult emotional reality of trying to care for an elderly loved one who has difficulty understanding his own condition and can snap in strange ways at any moment, and we know that nothing can last forever, not even our greatest heroes.